[music playing]
ANNOUNCER: From New York City, the only city in America,
it's the show that invented news.
This is The Daily Show, with your host, Sarah Silverman.
[applause]
Welcome to The Daily Show.
I'm Sarah Silverman.
And this is my last night hosting the show.
And I'm so sad to leave because I was just getting comfortable
doing that thing where you're mean to the crew guys,
but like, in a loving way.
I'm going to miss you Rich, you dumb bastard.
Take care of Charlie, you ugly piece of shit.
Steve, your wife's cheating on you.
We've got a great show for you tonight,
so let's get into headlines.
[music playing]
[applause]
Let's begin with Kim Jong-un, the only brutal dictator made
in a Build-A-Bear workshop.
This week, the North Korean leader announced a new law
that no one else in the country can
have the same name as his 10-year-old daughter, Ju Ae.
And this hits me personally because I'm--
you're ahead of it.
I'm pretty "Jew-ay."
But just imagine how much this would
suck for all the other Ju Ae's out there, you know?
They got to change their name now.
You got to switch your name on your internet bill,
your cable bill, your newspaper subscription.
I mean, they don't have those there, but still.
Moving on to some important news
from the world of science, I was listening to the radio
yesterday, and I heard something
that stopped me short.
Take a listen.
REPORTER: It's now 5:03, and penis length is on the rise.
I'm sorry, what kind of radio station is this?
We've got weather on the ones and penis on the threes.
But yes, according to a new study,
the average erect penis length has
increased 24%, over the last three decades, to 5.5 inches.
[applause]
Yeah, I know, right?
Look at that.
Women in the audience are going, that's it?
And the men are like, oh, thank God.
Now no one is sure why this happened.
My theory is that at some point around 1993,
men started measuring their penises
starting from their assholes.
This is-- this is not how we expected men to evolve
over the last 30 years.
Women have been saying, please, we just want you to be more
in touch with your emotions.
And men are like, all we can give you is a longer dick.
And we're like, OK, we'll take it.
Well, let's move on to the 2024 presidential race,
where GOP candidate Nikki Haley launched
her campaign with a rally that featured a very
interesting opening act.
This is John Hagee.
He's an American pastor and a televangelist
with a history of making outlandishly
offensive comments.
In 2006, he claimed that Hurricane Katrina
was God's way of punishing the city for allowing
a gay pride parade.
He once claimed that God sent Hitler
to hunt the Jewish people as part of a divine plan
to drive them back to the land of Israel.
And he claimed women are only meant to be
mothers and bear children.
But Pastor Hagee has found a presidential candidate
who is willing to embrace him.
Today he gave the opening prayer
for the presidential campaign kickoff
for former governor Nikki Haley.
To Pastor Hagee, I still say I
want to be you when I grow up.
Oh, Pastor Hagee, I hope one day I can appreciate
Hitler as much as you do.
I mean, right now my appreciation of Hitler
is like here.
I want to get it up, get it up to about here.
And look, you know, sure, this guy thinks the Holocaust
is good, and that's not good.
But on the bright side, he does believe it happened.
You know, you got to take the W's where you can.
But Pastor Hagee wasn't the only notable person
there last night.
Jordan Klepper also headed down to Nikki Haley's rally
for another installment of Fingers the Pulse.
Check it out.
[music playing]
[applause]
JORDAN KLEPPER: Nikki Haley, the former South Carolina
governor and Trump UN ambassador
has decided to throw her hat in the ring
and run against her old boss.
So I went to her campaign launch in South Carolina
to see if the party was really ready to turn the page.
Are you excited about Nikki Haley for president?
Very excited.
She has done great things for South Carolina.
She's tough.
She's a woman. Women rule.
The Republican Party needs a change,
and we need someone with Nikki's
foreign policy expertise.
I love Donald Trump, but I think that she has
more of a feminine finesse.
You think Trump has a harder time with communicating
with ladies? - Yes.
Yes.
He has a harsher approach when it comes to women.
He does.
And he sometimes has to pay for it.
He sometimes has a hard time navigating it.
Yes.
I mean, I think she's really running to get-- like,
I don't think she'll win.
Oh, so--
I think it's for VP.
So this is just sort of like batting practice?
It's just fun to be here.
Why not?
JORDAN KLEPPER: VP or president, I
was curious to see how Haley could win
over ardent Trump supporters.
I voted for Trump, but I certainly
will not be doing that again.
When did Trump lose your support?
The nail in the coffin for me with Donald Trump--
Let me guess--
Charlottesville?
No.
OK, let me--
- You're not going to guess it. - Kids in cages?
Nope.
The insurrection, January 6.
The-- no.
Oh, OK. Wait, hold on.
First impeachment? - No.
- Second impeachment? - Nope.
OK, inviting white supremacists
over to Mar-a-Lago?
No, but that--
I mean, you know, criticizing DeSantis before his election.
Wouldn't have guessed it.
So that's the line right there?
That was a nail in the coffin for me.
I would have guessed kids in cages.
I told you you wouldn't have guessed it.
I know.
I would have saved you 30 minutes.
This is why you come out and talk to people.
You're constantly surprised. - Yep.
JORDAN KLEPPER: Haley has been either a strong Trump
critic or a vocal Trump ally depending on the time of day.
Could this pose a problem?
Did you feel like she sufficiently
stood up to Donald Trump when she needed to?
I think she has.
And I think Nikki Haley's not afraid to stand
up to any male or female with her voice of opinion.
Yeah, so after January 6, she wasn't afraid to say,
this is disgusting?
That's right.
And then a couple of weeks later,
to say they were being too hard on him?
Yes.
Yes, we agree.
I agree totally.
An individual respects you if you can stand up to them.
So if something awful happens like Charlottesville--
She speaks her mind.
Charlottesville happens, she's not afraid to criticize
Trump, walk right in there, and hand in her 52-week notice.
Right is right.
She knows right from wrong.
JORDAN KLEPPER: It's a campaign that's distancing itself
from the far right fringe, except if you look closely
at Haley's first speaker, Pastor John Hagee, who has
unusual views on the weather.
As a candidate, you have that responsibility
to not get in the gutter.
So hopefully we can stay in a more positive place.
Well, the first person I saw on stage
was Pastor Hagee, who thinks hurricanes are
a punishment for gay people.
Is that really what he said?
How long ago that?
That was-- that was around Katrina.
Yeah.
That's an interesting opening act.
Pastor Hagee has said that hurricanes were
God's punishment for gays.
Oh, no.
He preaches the gospel.
I mean, I've followed him for years.
Yeah. Yeah.
But maybe if she wants to attract moderates, come
in with a little bit more of a moderate pastor who thinks
something more acceptable, like tornadoes are caused
by too much masturbation.
Oh my goodness, yeah, that's way out there, no.
- That's too far? - Oh, yeah.
Gotcha.
JORDAN KLEPPER: And there's that line again.
Good to know.
[applause]
Thank you, Jordan.
All right, when we come back, I'll
tell you why you're so mad.
So don't go away.
[applause]
[cheering]
Welcome back to The Daily Show.
Ever notice how you hate everyone
who disagrees with you?
If you said yes, then you're not alone.
And if you said no, then [bleep] you.
[laughter]
But you're not the only one who feels this way.
REPORTER: After 244 years together as a nation,
we seem to be growing apart.
REPORTER: Americans are fiercely
split not only about policy, but on the basic decency
of the other side.
REPORTER: Growing shares in each party
now describe those in the other party
as more closed minded, dishonest,
immoral, and unintelligent.
REPORTER: According to an NBC poll, 62% of college Democrats
say they would not dorm with a Republican.
REPORTER: 80% of Americans now have few or no
friends across the aisle.
REPORTER: In a poll before the last election,
15% of Republicans and 20% of Democrats
agreed that the country would be
better off if large numbers of the opposing party just died.
[laughter]
We'd be better off if the other side just died?
What?
That's crazy.
Please, think about it.
The entire country would be haunted by the ghosts
of your enemies--
enemies who, by the way, can and will watch you masturbate.
And why can't you share a dorm room with someone
you disagree with politically?
It's a difference of opinion, not airborne chlamydia.
[laughter]
Also, it would be great to dorm with a Republican.
Do you know how fun it would be to sexile
someone who doesn't even believe in premarital sex?
[laughter]
Sorry, don't come in.
We're drying our wet spot with your all lives matter shirt.
[laughter]
[cheering]
So the question is, how did we as a country
become this divided?
Let's talk about it in our latest installment
of Long Story Short.
[cheering]
Outrage in America isn't new.
It's one of our oldest pastimes right
behind baseball and racism.
But what is new is just how much money
entire industries are making off our outrage,
starting with social media.
Their entire business model depends
on keeping your eyeballs on the screen
until your tuchus gets numb on the toilet seat.
And nothing does that better than anger.
I've actually been on the toilet with my phone
so long that I pee again.
[laughter]
In 2018, an internal Facebook report
showed that their algorithm purposely
feeds users divisive content in order to increase
time on their platform.
We've all experienced this.
I mean, personally, I am way more likely to click
on some dude's transphobic rants
than another picture of my cousin's twins.
I mean, don't get me wrong.
Both those kids are [bleep] up in their own truly
fascinating way, but they're not keeping
me scrolling till 2:00 AM.
And once the algorithm figures out what pisses you off,
it runs with it right off a cliff.
REPORTER: In the summer of 2019,
Facebook ran an experiment.
It created a fake account for a 41-year-old mom living
in North Carolina.
They called her Carol Smith.
Carol started off by liking a few popular conservative
Facebook pages like Fox News, Donald
Trump, and Melania Trump.
But quickly Facebook began dragging her down a rabbit
hole of misinformation.
After only two days-- two days--
Facebook recommended Carol follow a QAnon page.
And a few days later it suggested she follow another.
By week three of the experiment,
Carol's feed had become quote, "a constant flow
of misleading and polarizing content."
And so Facebook began sending push notifications.
One notification was actually to a Facebook post
claiming Barack Obama was born in Kenya.
Wow, Facebook radicalized a person in just three weeks.
Even Isis was like, why can't we get numbers like that?
And that's just one example.
Everything on the internet is so sweaty.
I bought one credenza from West Elm in 2016,
and ever since then, they've been emailing me, like,
five times a day.
And by the fifth one, they're so desperate.
They're like, if you check out our new throw pillows,
we'll suck your [bleep].
[laughter]
But as bad as the internet is, studies
show that it's nothing compared to how cable
news increases polarization.
Because at least on the internet,
different viewpoints sneak their way into your feeds.
But nobody on Earth is flipping back and forth between MSNBC
and Fox News, except for me.
Because I like to break out of my bubble
and watch the reverse mortgage commercials from both sides.
[laughter]
Now, all the major cable news networks rile you up.
But no one is better at it than Fox News.
They've become the top cable news network
by making their viewers livid.
And they're not subtle about it either.
This story will have you fired up this morning.
US soldiers now learning about the dangers
of white privilege.
We have a story that will make your blood boil.
Infamous social justice warrior Colin
Kaepernick is now the brand new face of a Nike ad campaign.
If you just paid your taxes, this next story
will piss you off.
This is going to enrage you.
You're going to be outraged when
we tell you what happened.
Prepare to be outraged.
Get ready to be angry.
This story is going to make you sick.
This story will make you want to throw your newspaper,
make your blood boil.
This next news story is going to make you so mad--
you'll want to punch yourself in the butthole.
[laughter]
You'll be so mad-- you'll puke on your nana.
You'll be so outraged by this next story-- you'll rip out
all your pubes in one pull.
[laughter]
So thank you, cable news.
Now, at the top of the anchor food chain
are the politicians who benefit the most from our outrage.
Because politicians know that rage equals donations.
That's why they're constantly pushing stupid culture
war issues on us, whether they're
real or completely made up.
This morning, a new warning about the dangers
of misinformation spreading online and making
its way into political races.
And this latest claim that some school districts
are providing cat litter boxes for students
who identify as cats.
REPORTER: The first sign of the rumor in the US
appears to have been this Michigan School board meeting
last December, where it was discussed by a parent
without proof, then shared on Facebook
by a chairwoman of the Michigan Republican Party,
referring to furries.
The false story snaking its way across the country
and now into Republican stump speeches.
Have you heard about the litter boxes stuff?
[crowd agrees]
If we don't push back on the craziness,
it's not going to end.
A cat-- they put tails on, and they demand that they have
a litter box in the school.
Not because there's actual cats in the room,
but because there's kids going around licking themselves
as though they're cats.
We've literally got kids who think
they're cats and dogs, using litter boxes in classrooms.
No, you don't.
[laughter]
[applause]
You literally don't.
Kids are not trying to shit in litter boxes in school--
or at all.
I mean, most kids won't shit in toilets in school.
Are you kidding me?
Other kids might know that you shit, and that's a secret.
[laughter]
This is how I know it's a lie--
because they don't have one example
of it happening-- not one.
But that didn't stop them from spreading
it because it benefits them.
So long story short, if you're wondering
why you're so angry all the time, it's not a coincidence.
The system is designed to provoke you.
And politicians like this system
because they profit from it.
They survive from it.
They can say anything as long as it's what their audience
wants to believe.
That's why when there was a bill that would have required
fundraising emails to be fact checked,
Marjorie Taylor Greene blocked it.
Now that was a lie I just made up.
[laughter]
But you all licked it up, didn't you?
You're so ready to donate to my campaign.
[applause]
And once you notice how much this system profits off
your anger, it's not surprising that people would like
the other side to just die.
It's not surprising that people are
afraid to dorm with the monsters who believe
different lies than us.
It's not even surprising when a mob of people believing they
are righteous stormed the Capitol,
an event where, ironically, a bunch of furries
used Nancy Pelosi's office as a litter box.
[laughter]
All right, stay tuned because when we come back,
we'll talk more about this with New
Yorker writer Jia Tolentino.
[cheering]
Welcome back to The Daily Show.
My guest tonight is a staff writer at The New Yorker
and author of the best seller, Trick Mirror--
Reflections on Self Delusion.
She's here to talk about social media
companies monetizing hate and how we can use the internet
as a force for good.
Please, welcome Jia Tolentino.
[cheering]
Yes!
So you've written about social media companies
and how they monetize rage.
Is there any way to--
is there any way that they could
be incentivized to stop this?
One way that I think about it is, like,
did corporations all throughout, like,
the last century until the '70s have any incentive
to stop poisoning rivers and dumping their waste
all over the place?
They didn't.
It's cheaper to be shitty, right?
Like, it is in their financial best interest
to just keep poisoning the river until someone
makes them stop, which we could.
But it's in their best interest for us to feel bad, right?
You never hear someone being like, I had an amazing day.
I just sat, and I scrolled for six hours, right?
It's like you only do that when you feel-- you only scroll
that long when you feel bad.
And when you do that, when you scroll for that long,
you feel even worse.
And then you do it more.
And that cycle is the primary way--
SARAH SILVERMAN: It's like cocaine.
It is like cocaine, except less fun.
Right.
I'm chasing that first one.
It's just not going to come back to you.
Yeah, exactly.
But it's interesting because I see stories
pop up that give me outrage.
And I realize that they're designed to do it.
Like, it took me a second.
A friend of mine who leans a little right
texted me this story about how the LGBT community wants
to ban "Natural Woman"-- you make
me feel like a natural woman by Aretha Franklin.
And I did, like, two clicks of research, and, of course,
it was from a parody account, but picked up from papers.
And then the parity account even
said afterwards, like, nobody called us for a comment--
not one person. - Right.
And then--
JIA TOLENTINO: No one checked the about page on the website.
Yeah, and then on the left, you know,
I read an article about the Missouri Senate
making women senators-- they couldn't wear
sleeveless shirts.
And I was about to go apeshit.
And then I went, oh, but the men
have to wear ties and suits.
It's just a dress code.
But it was designed to make me go bananas, and it did.
Right.
I mean, everything-- like, if you are on a social media
platform that what you see is governed by an algorithm,
which is basically all the major ones,
it's all designed to make you feel like the best
person possible and that everyone
else is a dumb piece of shit.
That is what gets us to spend as much time on there
as possible.
SARAH SILVERMAN: Yeah, I used to call
that righteousness porn.
- Yeah. - Yeah.
Yeah, and then you realize you don't
actually want to see these male lawmakers
wearing tank tops anyway.
You don't see them--
we don't see anyone's upper arms.
You just want to be able to say, point to someone as wrong
and me as right. - Right.
And you get off on it.
And it's also, like, there's so many things
to actually be mad about.
And a lot of the stuff that's-- it's like, some
celebrity said something dumb.
It's like, do we care?
Does this matter?
Like, I think one of the things that drives me
personally nuts about all of it is that there's
no sense of scale.
It's like everything is presented as equally
and maximally enraging when, actually, there are
some things that matter a lot.
Most things matter very little or nothing at all.
And we're taught that we should all be as mad as possible
about all of it all the time, right?
Well, yeah.
I mean, like, you went off Twitter a few years ago--
congratulations.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
[applause]
I thought it would turn me into, like,
a genius and, like, a great happy person, and it just--
I'm wasting just a little less time.
SARAH SILVERMAN: Right, right.
But, I mean, like, I definitely-- like,
I'm kind of exit only on there now.
And is that right?
I just will post stuff I need to post for--
You get in and out.
--show dates or something.
But that has made my life a little--
definitely a little-- you realize
that Twitter is not the world.
Right, right.
And, I mean, I got off because--
like, I don't know if you had this experience,
but it was like as soon as the pandemic started--
and my life shrank to one room and a weekly trip
to the grocery store.
And the internet ballooned to fill the rest of my existence.
And I was like, this sucks, you know?
Like, the internet is never supposed
to be bigger than your life.
And when the pandemic made it bigger
than actual, physical life, I was like, I
got to get out of here.
Twitter is such a cesspool now.
It's so negative.
How-- is there any way to unravel this?
Well, I think that as long as these companies--
the primary way they make their money is for us to spend
as much time as possible on them, and the best way,
as you were saying in that segment,
for them to ensure that we spend as much time on them
as possible is through all of the emotions that make us feel
as bad as possible-- self righteousness and anger
and everyone getting as mad as possible
as a group about something you're going
to forget about the next day.
As long as that is the economic model, there is no hope.
But I think, again, as with the corporations that
were making all the fish die in the rivers,
you can make them change.
We could regulate this.
Right, if we put pressure on our government or--
Yeah, I mean, well--
[laughs]
Our government is, like, also nursing
at the teat of big tech.
100% I think one thing that's necessary
is for people to remember that we
don't have to feel like, yeah, yeah, the internet--
we all feel insane on the internet.
We all feel so bad all the time.
And that's just the way it is, right?
I think that we are capable of getting as mad about this
as people did about--
in the environmental movement in the '70s, right?
Like, we are capable of generating pressure
and putting it on lawmakers.
And there are things like you could
end automated recommendations, right?
Automated recommendations are the reasons
that a mom of two in Cleveland starts looking up
smoothie recipes for her two-year-old
and ends up believing that Wayfair is shipping
orphans in their things.
And the--
Designed to radicalize.
Exactly right, and so much of that--
so much of that is automated recommendations because that--
and people have been recommending
for years for that.
Simply ending those, those are one of the biggest reasons
that the internet has gotten so much worse, so much less
fun, so much less surprising is because these companies just
identify the kind of person you are,
and then funnel you towards whatever the worst
version of that person is.
YouTube is bizarre.
One time, I made the mistake of going like,
what is this globaliza--
like, globalists?
What do they mean by globalists?
And I became an anti-Semite within, like, 15 minutes.
[laughter]
Yeah, it's amazing how well it works.
And there are things like you could end legal immunity
for these companies if violence is
caused by something that was generated on these platforms.
The worst that actual offline life
is, the more people spend on the internet, right?
And we just have really done very little
in terms of public policy to make actual life better
for people, right, to give people more money and more
freedom and to give people free public spaces to hang out
so it's not like the only place they hang out is the internet.
We've done so little to improve actual life that it, I think,
is one of the things that drives people over
and over to just be like--
SARAH SILVERMAN: Yeah.
You know?
Like, for hours at a time.
And, I mean, I feel like a Boomer saying that,
but I feel like that would help a lot.
Well, yeah.
Also, it's like--
I feel like social media originally was designed--
or its intention was to connect, right?
To connect people.
But, instead, I think it's kind of put us in silos,
and it's given us this existential, like, do I exist?
Even selfies I feel like are just a constant question of,
do I exist? I exist, right?
JIA TOLENTINO: Right.
And it's interesting, but there's anger.
People make money from our anger.
They get clicks from anger.
But there's some good anger on the internet,
where people are organizing.
JIA TOLENTINO: Right.
So how do you--
not how do you differentiate, but how
do you keep the good anger and get
us away from the shitty anger?
Well, what you were saying about connection,
it's like we--
the version of connection that is generated through hate
is not a kind of connection that makes sense in real life.
It's only a kind of connection that
is incentivized and sounds good on the internet, right?
Like, in real life, where we actually, like, oh, I
want to spend six hours face deep in the business
of someone I hate, no, right?
We do our business based on affinity and the things
that we care about and the things
that we positively want.
And I think about, as much as I think the internet as it's
structured right now is kind of inevitably
an existential and civic net negative, that there
are still these things.
I mean, you think about the protests, summer 2020.
They wouldn't have turned into what they became with, like,
a quarter of Americans hitting the streets at some point
if it wasn't for a continual stream of videos on Twitter
of police brutalizing the protesters at the police
brutality protests, right?
There is still radical potential.
You think about what people are doing with abortion access
right now on the internet, forming
these underground networks and getting people
to travel across state lines and making sure anyone
can get pills who needs them.
You know, I try to remember that we still can and will
try to be human within a mechanism
that wants us to be less so.
And we can keep doing it.
SARAH SILVERMAN: Well, yeah, it's like the Wild West,
but the leaders are billionaires.
And, I mean, everything--
I feel like every single thing, every conversation
I've had here, I feel like, boils down to Citizens United.
Because as long as people can line politicians' pockets,
they're buying policy.
And our votes don't--
I mean, your vote counts.
[laughter]
Our votes just simply don't count.
[laughs]
Yeah, but that's very frustrating.
It doesn't-- it's clearly not right.
You know, but, of course, they name it Citizens United.
It sounds beautiful.
Let's hold for the siren.
No, I'm just kidding.
Just wanted to show that I'm in show business,
and I know how things work.
Well, yeah, and I think part of it--
I mean, we see this pushback now, right?
There is a fomenting sort of pushback
and a dissatisfaction.
And the hope is that it bubbles over into actual pressure
on lawmakers to do something.
But for a long time we accepted the general model
of Silicon Valley, the move fast,
break things, sort of move faster than regulation
could ever get you.
We accepted that as like, oh, that's amazing.
That will result in us pressing a button
and getting, like, a car at our doorstep and any kind of food
we want.
Like, we for a really long time accepted
the conveniences that the internet economy provides us.
We're such sluts for convenience.
We're such little sluts for convenience.
And then they just snap those little handcuffs of anger
around us, and here we are.
Yeah, you go like, iPhones are made by child labor.
I'm going to-- well, let's see.
JIA TOLENTINO: Order some stuff.
Yeah.
JIA TOLENTINO: Click to order.
Yeah, like Amazon, you know?
I was like, no, no one's boycotting Amazon.
It's too convenient.
Yeah, but the thing is you can.
And I think that, like, the real first step in all of this
is remembering, like, we--
I mean, I have to have-- it's very Orwellian.
I have a program called Self Control on my computer
and a program called Freedom on my phone.
And those things because I have neither, and both
of those things lock me off of social media
for, like, 15 hours a day.
And I have needed to do that because I'm
such a little slut for all of the things that makes me mad.
And it does work.
Like, you can just refuse to participate
in little, little bits until maybe, suddenly,
your life has changed a little.
And I would recommend-- it's worth a try.
SARAH SILVERMAN: Yeah, definitely.
I mean, they say, like, of course,
nobody can sleep because you're on your phones.
You've got to turn the screens off.
And I'm like, yeah, but, also, no.
But I prefer to drop my phone on my forehead--
That's exactly what I do.
--seven times a night.
This is when I go to sleep. Oh, oh.
Yeah, yeah.
Oh, OK.
How do we fix the internet?
[laughter]
Is there any hope in all of this?
Yeah, yeah.
I think in regulation, and I think in public pushback.
And I think in all of us spending less time
on our phone, whether that means
refusing convenience, certain things that are convenient.
I think it means--
I think all of these things are possible.
But we have to maybe accept that in order
to resist social media, in order
to resist the constant surveillance that's hitting us
on our phone that all these companies are, like, tracking
and reselling to other companies
to make money off of everything we do,
we have to maybe refuse a little bit
of the cheap pleasure and the convenience
that the phone gives us.
But I think we can.
All right, OK.
I think we can too.
The paperback edition of Trick Mirror is available now.
Check this out.
OK, we're going to take a quick break,
but we'll be right back after this.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
[cheering]
[applause]
Well, that's our show for tonight,
and that's my time for this week.
But come back again because your next host
is Hasan Minhaj.
And if you want to catch a little more of me,
come out and come see me on tour.
Check out the link or the QR code below for dates.
And now here it is, your moment of zen.
FEMALE REPORTER: Due to old laws on the books in South
Carolina, anyone under 18 playing pinball machines
is breaking the law.
MAN: How old are you, Clark?
13.
MAN: OK, Clark, did you know in South Carolina,
it's illegal for anybody 17 and under to play pinball?
It is?
MAN: It is.
You going to keep playing pinball, Clark?
Probably.
MTV.