- From the outside, this was a family
living the American dream.
- They were together close to 20 years.
They seemed like they were in love. Everything was going pretty well.
- They came up with the idea
to start a business to do government contracts.
- Her husband would find contracts that they could look into
and bid on. But all financial dealings
were through Natalie Coughlin.
- Things are not what they appear to be.
Michael was about to completely uncover what was going on.
He starts asking her, where is this money?
- These crimes are so impactful
because they erode trust in one another.
As much as I want to believe in the goodness of people,
the bad that they're capable of has no limits.
(dramatic, high-tempo music)
- Beckley's quiet for the most part.
Not really too much happens. It's not big city living.
But it's also not really rural like you would see.
It's kind of like maybe in between is how I would describe it.
- The coal mining industry is crucial to the economy,
to the job market for this area.
Railroads. Those two things go hand in hand.
- Everyone here has family members who go back generations,
having been coal miners or worked in coal mine construction.
- It's still pretty big now,
but it's not quite as big as it was then.
A lot of them kind of up and left.
When these companies up and leave, a lot of the people are just
kind of like left behind. There's not really
any economic opportunities for them.
So when they left, the population almost did with them.
- I'm in Beckley a lot and I never feel uncomfortable,
I never feel like I'm not safe.
I feel like we live
in a very sheltered part of the world, really,
especially in the US.
I think this is a very, I guess, boring, for lack of a better term,
a boring place to live.
If you're looking for a lot of drama,
we don't have that.
You know, I think that has been part of the appeal of this investigation
is because it is a little dramatic, and we usually don't have that here.
- I think this got media attention because it's like a TV drama.
You have very extensive fraud scheme,
so many different victims.
- Michael and Natalie Cochran were together close to 20 years.
They seemed like they were in love.
Everything was going pretty well for 'em.
- They were described as being high school sweethearts
and attended college together after high school.
She obtained her pharmacy degree.
They lived briefly in Tennessee, then moved back to West Virginia,
where she was employed as a pharmacist.
- By all accounts, they were a happy couple.
Everyone wanted to be them.
You know, from the outside,
this was a family living the American dream.
They had children who were involved in sports and extracurriculars.
The parents were very involved in those activities,
so they were a very tight-knit family.
Or at least that's how it appeared.
- They started Tactical Solutions Group
in 2017. At the time they started the business,
Natalie was still employed as a pharmacist.
Less than two months after they started the business,
she quit her job as a pharmacist
and went to work full-time for the business,
and the business was formed with her being the primary owner.
- Her husband would find contracts that they could look into
and bid on.
But all financial dealings were through Natalie Cochrane.
- Natalie and Michael would look into these contracts
that the government needed filled, whether that would be for firearms,
computers, medical supplies,
pretty much anything you can think of
that the government might need.
They would then bid on those contracts and say,
we can fulfil it for this amount of money.
And they would get special status
because Natalie was listed as the majority owner on the company.
So it was listed as a woman-owned company.
It was also listed as a minority ethnicity-owned company,
because she purported herself to be Native American as well.
That gave her preference on bids.
So they would then be awarded a contract
and would solicit investments from people in the community,
family members, friends,
and would say, hey, if you invest this amount of money,
I can promise you a large amount of return on your investment.
You're going to get back more than you put in
and help us fulfil these contracts.
They would say that they had all these contacts in guns
and technology and things, that's where
they would be able to fulfil contracts.
- Natalie Cochran had been soliciting money
from the friends and family,
and they begin to ask questions to Michael Cochran.
And so Michael Cochran had approached Natalie
and was beginning to wonder where the money was,
cos apparently some investors weren't getting their money back.
- The December, end of January of 2019
the US government had experienced a shutdown,
but it provided Natalie a little bit of cushion
and a little bit of time to fend off the investors,
fend off Michael, because he was being very adamant
at that time, wanting to know why they didn't have access
to the wealth that she had told him that they had.
So as the government shutdown was ending
and it was being very well publicised in the media,
she knew that was coming,
so she started telling all the investors,
including Michael, that the funds
from all their government contract work was going to be moved
to a wealth management account at the Bank of America in Virginia,
because, according to her, the banks here in the local area
didn't have the ability to manage the amount of wealth
that they had accumulated.
Michael Cochrane was literally at the end of his rope.
He wasn't accusing his wife of anything.
He was directing his anger and his frustration at the banks,
at the government. All these things that she was feeding to him,
he was accepting that.
- Natalie and Michael were about to fly out to Virginia
the morning that Michael fell ill,
and they were going to find out why their Bank of America account
was not being funded, and this is $9 million missing at this point.
And if they do that, then Michael finds out that nothing is real.
Things are not what they appear to be.
Michael was about to completely uncover what was going on,
to figure out that this was all a scam.
He starts asking her, where is this money?
Why have you not been paying my family back?
And they're telling me that they haven't gotten any money.
Also, where's the money we're supposed to get?
- Michael was getting excuse after excuse after excuse
as to why the money wasn't coming into the account
and being paid out to the investors.
So Michael was under the impression
that Bank of America was wrongfully sitting on all this money
that needed to come out. The Cochrans,
Natalie, in particular, chartered a flight
from Beckley to Virginia
to meet with the Bank of America banker handling their account.
That was to take place on the 6th of February, 2019.
- The morning that they are supposed to take that flight,
Natalie wakes up and says, oh, I'm really sick.
I need to go to the doctor. I think I have the flu.
So she goes to the doctor.
Michael says, go ahead and cancel the flight.
We can go tomorrow.
- We were told by three witnesses
that they were summoned by Natalie to the Cochran residence
on February 6th because she needed help with Michael,
and she indicated to them that he had fallen ill
and that she needed help with him.
- She actually took a picture of Michael
crumpled up in the kitchen floor and sent it to them,
and of course, people receiving this are horrified.
- When they got there, they found him in the kitchen floor,
unresponsive, unconscious.
She requested that they place him on the couch in the living room.
He had had two prior illnesses leading up to that,
in late October, early November. She was referencing that to them,
saying that he was sick like the last time,
and they knew he had been ill
and he had sought medical treatment for that.
Once they moved him to the couch,
she was checking his vital signs,
to include his blood glucose level.
- There had been a number of people in and out of the Cochrane home
all urging Natalie to take Michael to the hospital,
and she ignored all of that advice,
claiming that Michael didn't want to go to the hospital.
But he clearly needed to go.
- Between 7 and 8 p.m.,
Chris Davis came to the house.
He immediately made the decision that they were going to take Michael
to the hospital, and they drove him in a personal vehicle,
they didn't wait for an ambulance.
- Michael's family was not contacted until very late in the night,
after Michael had already gone to the hospital
and was being transported to a facility
where he would have required more care.
- Michael Cochrane was really big into weightlifting.
Natalie said that he would take a lot of supplements,
apparently handfuls at a time.
She said he would take anabolic steroids
on a dropper and that sort of thing in his mouth.
Natalie Cochrane said
that was maybe one of the reasons that he died.
- I first learned about this case in March of 2019.
My colleague that I was working with at the time,
Mr Heinzman, and I had just completed a cold case investigation
that we had worked on together,
but we had also been working towards identifying other cases
moving forward that we wanted to try to work on.
So I had a couple of those lined up and he said,
let me tell you about this case that I just heard about.
He had happened to cross paths
with another West Virginia state trooper
by the name of Sergeant Alan Marsh.
Sergeant Marsh was telling him about a friend of his
who was a local business owner.
He had entered into some type of investment with Natalie Cochran.
He was concerned because he had quite a bit of money
tied up in this deal, and he wasn't even trying
to get law enforcement involved necessarily, he said,
I just want to get my money back.
I don't want anybody to get in trouble with the law.
That's the resolution I'm seeking.
But in that conversation,
he also says Natalie Cochran's husband
recently passed away under suspicious circumstances.
All those red flags were just jumping out,
and I told Bob, I said,
well, even on on its face, I said, that is suspicious.
I said, you know, and there was no immediate rush to judgment,
it was just one of those things
that we have the time to investigate this. That's our job.
This was something that was fresh, and I was like,
let's focus on that, you know?
And he agreed, and we started the investigation.
There was no thought process from the beginning
that this was a murder.
There were just telltale signs that there was a lot more happening
than what met the eye.
We met with the United States Attorney's Office
for the Southern District of West Virginia,
because we realised that pretty early on
that if the financial scheme was of the magnitude
that we believed it was that they were best suited
to prosecute those crimes, if there were crimes identified.
They were very receptive to the case,
and that gave us the subpoena powers that we really needed
to really get the financial documentation
to take a really deep dive
into what was going on with Tactical Solutions Group.
- One of our investigators, Bob Heinzmann,
going through the transactions, said, this is a Ponzi scheme.
- A Ponzi scheme is essentially where a person gets investors
to invest in a company that doesn't exist.
And they continue to get investors and sort of perhaps
the second tier of investors provides money.
And the person who's operating the Ponzi scheme
would then perhaps use some of that money
to pay the initial investors. It kind of has a snowball effect.
- She had run this massive Ponzi scheme, and had gotten
lots of local business people who I knew specifically,
taken them for basically everything that they had.
- I think people would be surprised that there was that much money
in southern West Virginia that you could bilk people out of,
but people cashed in retirement plans
to join her parade of horrors.
For the most part,
they were friends, family or both.
But there were some other people. She took advantage
of some high end professionals, lawyers, dentists, smart people.
But they fell for Natalie's line.
- Natalie's Ponzi scheme involved obtaining investors to invest
in two of her companies that were purportedly
dealing with federal contractors to provide goods and services,
primarily to the Department of Defense.
- And what she would do is, she would claim that she had
a government contract that was going to generate
huge amounts of money. I mean,
we're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars
in turning over these contracts.
And what she would do, essentially,
is, she would get investor one to put in money,
then she would go to investor two to put in money,
and as long as she kept enough people happy...
She was paying out some of the money,
but it was other investors' money or loans,
and she'd say, you know, you could take this money right now,
but I've got a contract coming up in two weeks
and it's going to generate huge amounts of money.
Why don't you take a little bit of cash
and we'll roll that over into the next contract?
And that's what people did.
- She would manufacture fake contracts
to show potential investors.
She then obtained approximately $2.5 million
from various investors
in support of these fake contracts.
She used fake documentation also about her companies
to obtain either lines of credit or loans
from financial institutions.
So from both of those sources of income,
she at times would pay investors to lull them
into thinking that her businesses were legitimate.
Most of the money, however, went to her own personal accounts.
- Natalie Cochran left a huge electronic trail of evidence.
The text messages between Michael and Natalie were 1600 pages,
and you could just see the pattern.
And there was the same pattern Natalie used
with all the other text messaging that went out to her investors.
There was always an excuse. Always, the money's on the way,
here's the wire transfer number,
wire transfers come out between such and such a day
and such and such a time. All of it just nonsense.
That's what she was telling people,
and they kind of wanted to believe it.
And Michael kind of wanted to believe it, too,
because he just couldn't face the fact
that money was not being paid out.
There was a local businessman who has got to be
one of the luckiest people in Raleigh County,
because he was going to buy half of her non-existent business
for $4.9 million.
When the search warrant was executed,
the investigators found the contract for that sale:
he had already wired $50,000
to act as earnest money,
but he was about to send another 500,000,
and he didn't, because they went to him and said,
we think this is a bad idea, and here's why.
- The point at which they felt they had enough evidence
to charge her was at the time of the search,
and the search was just sort of the final part of the investigation.
I think they felt very comfortable,
and we felt comfortable there was enough to charge her.
- The U.S. Attorney's Office prosecuted her on the Ponzi scheme.
- There were 26 total counts in the indictment itself.
So what we did was kind of just picked representative counts,
two counts: one of wire fraud, which was, you know,
sort of the main thing that she was doing,
then the unlawful money transaction or money laundering.
- Judge Volk, who sentenced her, said that he was surprised
that the U.S. Attorney's Office was as lenient with her
as they were: he thought she deserved more time,
but couldn't give it to her due to the plea agreement.
- She only pled to one of the wire fraud counts.
In terms of calculating her sentence,
the money that's involved in all the counts
is added up and included.
So she's still responsible for all that.
She was sentenced for one count of wire fraud
and one count of an unlawful money transaction.
So 11 years for a white collar crime
for a person who has no criminal history.
- Outside of the Ponzi scheme conviction,
the biggest benefit was actually then being able to sit down
with people who were close to Natalie
who were victims of the Ponzi scheme,
because some of the folks, even when we told them,
hey, this is a Ponzi scheme, you're a victim here,
they didn't want to believe it. If you're a business person,
you don't want to feel like you've been played for a fool.
It just shows her level of manipulation.
The problem is not you. The problem's her.
And we're here to help you. But you got to let us help you.
You've got to tell us the truth and tell us everything you know
and everything you did with her. And when we broke down that barrier
and they started doing that, then we were able
to ask the really hard questions about Michael's death.
You're trying to put yourself in Natalie Cochran's position
and to look at the chessboard the way they see it.
And that's something I never wanted to do because I'm not that person.
I'm not like Natalie Cochrane.
I'm not like people who do these kind of crimes.
But in order to investigate 'em, you've got to get pretty damn close
to putting yourself in their shoes.
The reiteration of a thought that I've had for many years
of doing this is that...
..as much as I want to believe in the goodness of people...
..the bad that they're capable of has no limits.
And that's that's a hard way to look at life. But it's the truth.
- Natalie Cochrane has a very interesting history.
She was successful as a pharmacist.
They were paying her $120,000 a year.
The pharmacy she worked for sent her to school
to get her an MBA at no cost to her.
In southern West Virginia, you can do very well at $,120,000
And she was only going up.
I mean, pretty clearly CVS corporate
thought she had a big future. Otherwise they wouldn't have paid
for an MBA. But that wasn't enough. She had to have more.
So she got into what became her Ponzi scam.
And there was just money, and more money.
That's apparently all she cared about.
- Natalie Cochran's Ponzi scheme was that she was taking money
from mostly family members and friends,
hundreds of thousands of dollars.
- What she did was obtain investors
in those companies, presented them with fake contracts,
with the idea that when she fulfilled these contracts
with the federal government, whatever profit she would make
she would share with these investors.
There were never any contracts. Not one.
- Natalie Cochran was sentenced to 135 months in federal custody
for a Ponzi scheme.
That in itself, I think, is a testament to the level of loss
and the level of impact that her actions had on victims,
on the community, and the judge took that into consideration.
- The victims were awarded restitution.
That was part of the sentencing order by the judge.
As a practical matter, there's probably not going to be
total restitution, because we're talking $2.5 million
that she actually received.
There were some expensive items seized at the time of the search.
Those would have been auctioned off by the Marshal's Office
and then that gone to restitution.
She was ordered to pay restitution once she was released from prison.
- This was like a meteor hitting this community.
It tore people apart. It tore people's lives apart
financially, emotionally.
I mean, people lost their life savings.
And these are all people that we all know.
We're all thinking, that could have been me.
- Any advice I would have to people
so they would not fall victims of this
is ask questions.
If you hear that your investment
is almost too good to be true,
it's too good to be true.
Because even with a legitimate investment,
there's always risk. In this case, people trusted her.
She provided great evidence, though it was totally manufactured,
that her company was good.
So it's tough. It's just get all the information you can get.
- Unfortunately, I think one of the messages is, be careful.
You can't be as trusting as West Virginians tend to be,
and that that's kind of sad.
But that is certainly one of the messages,
and especially if you're going to cash in your retirement account,
be very careful.
- Elderly people are typically victims.
I was reading in AARP today about how to avoid those scams,
almost the whole publication is dedicated to that.
I think just providing that information
and just making them more aware that this kind of thing does happen.
Hopefully the media attention will bring attention
to this type of crime and do two things:
number one will serve to keep people
from committing the kind of crime,
and also just make people aware that these kind of fraudsters exist,
make them a bit more careful,
so they don't become victims themselves. So yeah,
and I think any time, no matter what type of crime
you're talking about, if the public knows about it
and all aspects of it, that does serve
to keep those crimes from happening.
- People we identified that would be
a potentially very important witness,
possibly in the Ponzi scheme, we had to talk to them
just about Michael's death.
I was trying to work on things
related more specifically to Michael Cochran
and what happened with him medically,
because there was no thought process from the beginning
that this was a murder.
The thought process was that we don't know,
and there's only one way to find out.
- 21, which was the blood glucose level that Michael Cochran had
when he got to the Raleigh general emergency,
the only way that level could have been achieved
was by administering and injecting insulin.
- Insulin is listed as being a chemical
used to regulate blood sugar.
The human body generates insulin, human insulin,
and lispro is basically a different structural isomer
of human insulin.
So it's very, very similar, it has all the same building blocks.
Two of those blocks are switched in order.
Instead of it being proline and lysine,
it's lysine and proline, hence the name lispro.
Those two are switched,
and they're designed to mimic the same behaviour of human insulin.
- Natalie Cochran was not only a pharmacist,
but she also claimed to be a specialist in diabetes.
And so she would counsel people, she would help people.
She knew the ins and outs of diabetes,
and knew very well the consequences of giving insulin to non-diabetics.
- And Michael Cochran was not diabetic.
While the government shutdown was going on,
she had also made the allegation that she had been diagnosed
with cancer, a form of leukaemia.
And that was not accurate. She was not.
And... that gave her an excuse
for sympathy from people,
from investors.
Jennifer Davis, being a close friend of hers, was very aware of that.
So they were texting about Natalie's condition,
and Natalie told her,
due to whatever physical ailment that she had at that time,
and the treatments that they were using to help her,
that was going to require that she would have to use insulin.
- Jennifer has a son who is diabetic,
so she knew that she could get that insulin from her.
Jennifer says, do you need to borrow a bottle?
Natalie says, yes, that might be easier, just go ahead and do that,
and Jennifer's husband drops off a bag with a couple of drinks
and the insulin bottle a couple of hours later.
- Michael's mother did not find out until close to midnight,
and she was a retired nurse.
If you call her at 1 p.m.,
being a retired nurse, and she comes to the house,
she's going to say, I'm calling an ambulance.
And Natalie knew that.
- Natalie was continuing to run the Ponzi scheme
while Michael was in the hospital. Still trying to solicit contracts.
still reaching out to investors, trying to get people to participate.
It turns out that while Michael's unconscious,
Natalie is actually in his phone and using it
and pretending to be him to other people.
She also had a scholarship in his memory,
with no money.
She awarded scholarships to a number of students
for four years of a college education,
sometimes five years of college education.
There was no money to support that,
but it diverted attention for a while.
When they executed the search warrant,
they found a bottle of insulin in her refrigerator.
It was identical to the insulin
that Natalie had fraudulently acquired,
but the insulin was still in the house in June,
and Michael died in February.
- This case was submitted to the lab in 2021.
I started working in June of 2021.
- The medical evidence in this case was very important,
because we were operating on a purely circumstantial case.
We had absolutely no direct evidence.
There's no eyewitness, there's no smoking gun.
We don't have DNA, anything like that
in this sort of case.
So the fact that we have medical evidence that says
Michael got to the hospital and his blood glucose was 21
is huge.
- This is a very unique case. The Ponzi scheme and a murder
is just something that you don't see very often.
- One reason that I was brought into the case
was to deal with the victims sort of pre-trial.
I've done a lot of that work. dealing with victims, witnesses
and that sort of thing.
So we dealt with Michael's mom and stepdad a good deal.
They just had a whole mix of emotions,
because this was their daughter-in-law,
and it was a daughter-in-law that they cared about.
They were hurt. They were angry,
including sometimes anger at us.
The case got delayed once after I got in, and that happens,
and we had to explain to them that this was normal,
and sort of alleviate any fears. I think
they were afraid she'd get away with it.
- We tried the murder case
five years after the Ponzi scheme was resolved.
Every conference and every time that I could see her do anything,
she was constantly trying to tell her attorneys what to do.
She was writing notes feverishly and passing them to them,
and I don't think she ever thought the trial would take place
or that she'd get convicted.
- We tried to keep our arguments pretty straightforward
and pretty in line, as opposed to the defence,
who touted five or six different theories.
But our theory of the case
was Michael was about to uncover the Ponzi scheme,
and Natalie could not allow that to happen.
So she obtained insulin from her friend Jennifer
because she was a diabetic counselor,
knew what insulin would do to the body, injected him with it,
and then made sure that he didn't receive
adequate medical care until it was too late.
I think the text messages were the main thing
that showed that the Ponzi scheme was related to the murder,
because we could look at those and we can see
Natalie giving Michael excuses over and over
about where money is, why money is missing,
when it's going to show up, why it hasn't shown up on those dates.
Then there comes this date that Michael is promised
we're going to see our money today.
He becomes so sick that he never wakes up again.
- The main arguments by the defence were that Michael was involved
in this every bit as much as Natalie,
that Michael was this big, strong, tough, healthy guy
that physically dominated her and his children,
or that he was so sickly he was going to die anyhow,
and that there's no connection between anything Natalie did
and his death. That's kind of a summary of the defence approach.
The two Cochran children that were the product of the marriage
both testified on behalf of their mom.
I felt sorry for them. They had had a horrible five, six years,
and they tried their best to help their mom.
- Michael's family I've gotten to be kind of close to
over the last few years. My heart breaks for them.
My heart breaks for Michael Cochran's children.
They're the additional victims here that nobody talks about.
We talk about the victims of the Ponzi scheme,
about Michael Cochran being a victim,
those two children are just as much victims as anyone.
You know, they didn't ask for any of this.
They were just born into that family
and then there they are. That was just heartbreaking.
And I hope that at some point in their lives
they're able to reconcile with this.
To see her sit there as a mother
and allow her children to go through that,
knowing she could have prevented it,
that showed me who she really is.
- From my getting to know her
strictly through the prosecution of this case,
she was very smart, she was very good at talking.
I think she had no problems with self-esteem.
She was able to talk her way out of everything,
and I suspect that she thought that right up to the end.
- I still believe she thinks that.
I think that she still believes that people are going to
just believe her because she's Natalie Cochran.
That was what she got by on for so long,
and was able to fool so many people.
- Mike was one of my best friends.
MAN: You miss him?
- His testimony was so emotional, cos it's his best friend he lost,
that I think it came across as very raw and very genuine.
His wife also testified, and she was again extremely emotional,
because she was not only very close with the Cochrans as a whole,
but she believed that Natalie was one of her best friends,
and she's been deceived by her to such a level
that she manipulated her into providing the murder weapon
for her husband.
So those two, I thought,
were particularly moving particularly important for our case.
That moment had a lot of shock value.
The jury, I think they kind of knew at that very moment.
JUDGE: It is the judgment and ruling of the court
that the defendant, Natalie Paige Cochran,
be committed to the penitentiary of this state
for her natural life.
- There's every indication, based upon what we saw,
that she has zero remorse.
She's never taken any responsibility for what she did.
She's always content to deflect. It's everybody else's fault
but hers. And the facts just don't support her on that.
I mean, there's no doubt in my mind
she did exactly what we accused her of.
And if given her druthers, she would try some other scam,
and clearly she's not afraid to kill people to achieve her goals.
There's no reason to think she wouldn't do it again.
- With Michael's family, nothing that we do can bring their son back,
but this is a sense of closure for them, I think.
It's probably the most closure that we could have gotten for them.
So I think that they can finally start to move on
and live their lives and let Michael rest.
- Had it not been for just a chance encounter
between Trooper Marsh and this investor
having a conversation as friends, cos they're friends,
he didn't seek Marsh out to tell him about this,
they just happened to cross paths and were talking, and he's like,
hey, by the way. One of those conversations.
So I don't know, you know, what your belief system is,
but is that divine intervention?
Is it fate? You know, whatever label you want to put on it.
Uh... I don't know,
but I'll take it. If that hadn't happened,
we wouldn't be having this conversation, I promise you.
- Our investigative team was absolutely wonderful.
They have been working on this case since 2019,
so six years before it went to trial,
from the time that they started working on it.
And there is no way that we could have done this without them.
They were so diligent and so thorough,
and they did not leave a single stone unturned.
I mean, the number of people they must have met and spoken with
during this investigation
is probably more than I will talk to in the next ten years of my career.
-What I do know is it's a trust game
and the victims lose... by trusting.
And... that's a... that's a hard thing to say,
because I don't want people to be any more suspicious of other people
than they already are, you know?
And that's why these crimes are so impactful,
because they erode our trust in one another.
They erode at the things
that make us want to believe in other humans.
And it's just... it's sickening that these things happen,
that, you know... there's so many ways
to make money in this world.
It's just a lazy-ass way to make money
by stealing off people that love you,
or people who trust in you.
I have no tolerance for it.
Michael Cochrane was on a quest.
He was on a quest to find out where his money was.
And that's all it was. If you read the text messages,
he's just trying to find out where... you tell me I'm wealthy,
show me the money, where's it at?
And every time he would get this close,
something would happen.
But February 6th, he wasn't this close,
he was going to walk in the door at the Bank of America,
and that was it. And she knew that.
It was... just like anything,
It just came to a head, and it was going to erupt.
And she had to stop that.
And that's what's so tragic for him.
He trusted his wife,
and it cost him his life.
(high-tempo, dramatic music)
Subtitles by Sky Access Services